Today's world has an unprecedented need
for security. From restricting access to
physical resources, such as buildings
and facilities, to controlling access to
IT resources such as computers and
networks. Verification of identity –
knowing exactly who is attempting to
gain access or execute a transaction –
is fundamental to any security solution.
To date, the most common approaches have
relied on access cards and user
name/password combinations – methods
that have proven to be insecure and
complex for both users and the
organization.
One of the most promising approaches for
reliable identity verification is
biometrics, because it identifies users
based on something that they are – an
innate biological characteristic – not
something that can be shared or stolen
like a card, a password or a PIN.
Biometrics barriers to entry
The term biometrics can often carry
negative connotations. Say the word and
a picture immediately forms in the
listener's mind – a picture that
includes:
- The complex installation of
expensive biometric readers at every
door, gate, or computer;
- The enrollment of sensitive
personal biometric information in a
database that the organization must
manage and protect; and,
- User frustration with intrusive
technology.
These elements, which have historically
been part and parcel of all biometric
security technologies, have been
impediments to the widespread adoption
of biometric solutions.
Benefits of biometrics
Even with the challenges that a
biometrics installation poses, many
companies have implemented biometrics to
meet regulatory mandates related to
security audits and access control.
Biometrics provide the robust identity
verification needed to support audit
trails and satisfy many regulations.
Unlike the use of proxy-type credentials
such as cards, passwords or PINs, which
can be easily shared or stolen,
biometric solutions offer non-repudiable
evidence of the user's identity and
confirms that the intended user was
present for an access transaction.
In traditional approaches, the biometric
data itself (such as a fingerprint) has
served as the access credential and is
transmitted to a back-end system for
matching and approval. Hence the need to
collect and store user's sensitive
biometric information in databases. If
we can separate the biometric data from
the credential transmission, however, we
can envision a more effective model – a
model where identity verification is
distinct from the credential delivery
transaction.
An emerging model is that of personal
biometrics. In this model, every user
has his or her own biometric reader
embedded in a token the size of a key
fob. When the user wants to gain access
to a protected resource, they simply
place their fingerprint on their own
token which compares it against the
fingerprint template stored in encrypted
memory. Only after a successful match
does the token release an access
credential, i.e., a card ID for opening
a door or a digital signature for
logging onto a computer. The biometric
information is never released.
The personal biometrics model has
numerous advantages. Consider the
following human factors issues:
Personal privacy. The user
remains in full and exclusive possession
of their biometric data. It is stored
securely on their personal device.
Personal privacy is maintained and the
user's biometric data is never shared,
collected or stored in any external
system.
Personal hygiene. Fixed readers
mounted at doors or gates are used by
large numbers of people and can
contribute to the spread of germs. As a
rule, people would prefer not to have to
touch a device that so many others are
touching. With a personal biometric
reader this issue is eliminated.
Then there are the organizational
factors:
Reduced cost and impact of
deployment. If a token can output
signals compatible with existing access
control infrastructure (proximity and
contact/contactless smart card readers,
and one-time password systems), the cost
and hassle associated with installing
new equipment systems can be avoided,
thereby enabling a rapid, affordable and
non-disruptive deployment. Additionally,
eliminating the need to carry multiple
access cards or to remember multiple
passwords reduces long-term credential
issuance and management costs.
Supports convergence. The model
of a single token that can communicate
with both physical and logical access
control infrastructure directly supports
an organizations' ability to move to
convergence of those previously separate
domains.
The Impact on Logical
Access
Passwords are universally recognized as
a problem – we simply have too many of
them in our modern lives. They are
difficult for users to remember and for
the organization to manage. Single
sign-on (SSO) software has been
developed to help address this
challenge, particularly in a corporate
IT environment where passwords must be
frequently changed. SSO software acts as
an agent for the user to streamline the
logon process and simplify the user
experience.
But with the convenience of SSO comes a
new risk. Before SSO, gaining access to
one of a user's many passwords might
have given you access to one small part
of their life and data. But with single
sign-on, one password is now the key to
the entire kingdom. As such, we need to
insure that the credential used to gain
access to the SSO system is highly
secure. Biometrics is a logical
consideration, but the traditional
implementation model would require the
installation of a biometric reader at
every PC.
The good news is that most IT systems
are compatible with another type of
credential – the smart card. Typical
smart cards are credit card sized cards
containing a secure chip that holds data
on its rightful owner, and credential
information like a personal
identification number (PIN). Operating
systems like Windows (and others) are
designed to accept a smart card as a
valid credential for logon in place of a
user name and password. The challenge is
that most PCs and other IT assets do not
have the ability to read the card – an
additional piece of hardware, the smart
card reader, is required.
The personal biometric approach can
address this need as well with tokens
that are smart card compliant (ISO 7816
part 3) and contain a USB port. When
connected to a PC the token presents
itself to the operating system or
application as a smart card, but only
AFTER the user validates their identity
on the token using the on-board
fingerprint reader. The result is a
biometrically secured smart card, in the
form of a personal token, which can be
used with standard PCs using only a USB
cable – no other hardware or software is
required.
Convergence – The end
game
IT and physical security systems have
historically been managed as separate
domains resulting in duplication of
identity management functions. Rising
costs and complexity related to the
management of separate identity
environments are causing organizations
to face the decision to either keep
their physical and IT strategies
separate, or merge them into a converged
security approach.
Utilizing the same identity solution in
both environments enables companies to
eliminate redundancies, enhance
security, and significantly reduce
complexity for both users and the
organization.
Personal biometrics introduces a simple
solution to this significant challenge,
since each token emulates both physical
and logical access credentials, and
interfaces with existing facility and IT
security infrastructure.
Conclusion
Biometrics offers substantial benefits
in addressing the need for reliable
verification of identity. Combining the
power of biometrics with a personal
token that can securely carry and
deliver the variety of credentials that
are utilized by the different systems in
today's buildings and IT environments –
and only deliver those credentials after
a biometric verification of identity –
can directly help organizations reduce
costs, streamline the lives of their
users, and achieve convergence of
identity across their physical and
logical security systems.
To view this article on the SC Magazine
website, click toe following link:
http://www.scmagazineus.com/Why-biometric-technologies-are-catching-on/article/57867/